Vitamin D Requirements
Although Canadians rely on diet and/or supplements to help maintain proper vitamin D status, our intake of vitamin D does not meet current recommendations.
Professor and Head, Division of Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Pharmacy & Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan
Although Canadians rely on diet and supplements to help maintain proper vitamin D status, our intake of vitamin D does not meet current recommendations. Theoretically, vitamin D needs could be met by skin synthesis. However, environmental factors during winter and sunscreen use in summer prevent Canadians from attaining adequate UVB exposure.
Although there still exists some debate about what constitutes adequate vitamin D status, a circulating level of 75 nmol/L of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] is currently accepted as the cutoff for vitamin D sufficiency.1 At this level, calcium absorption is maximal, PTH is suppressed, muscle strength is improved, the risk of falls is minimized, and there is a lower risk of osteoporotic fractures.2,3 Evidence from nonskeletal conditions, such as cancer and immune diseases, suggests risk reduction occurs at 25(OH)D levels above 75 nmol/L.1,3
Current vitamin D dietary recommendations were made in 1997,4 when a new paradigm of dietary recommendations called Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) was initiated. DRIs for vitamin D were set to maintain 25(OH)D at 30 nmol/L, thereby preventing rickets and osteomalacia. Since that time, research has shown new roles for vitamin D beyond rickets and osteomalacia prevention.1-3 This has led to discrepancies between the recommendations made by Health Canada (the 1997 DRIs) and various health organizations (see graph).5,6,7
Average daily intake levels of vitamin D and recommended levels
Average = intake of Canadians ≥1 year of age;
Ideal = intake according to Canada’s Food Guide;
Ideal + Supplement of 400 IU (per Canada’s Food Guide) for persons over 50 years;
DRI for >70 years = recommendation by Institute of Medicine in 1997;
OC = Osteoporosis Canada guidelines (2002) for persons >50 years;
CCS = Canadian Cancer Society recommendation (2007) for adults;
CPS = Canadian Pediatric Society;
UL = upper level set as highest intake considered safe (1997). 1 µg = 40 IU.
Canadians’ average intake of vitamin D is 5.8 µg.8 The “ideal” intake recommended by Canada’s Food Guide (CFG)—2 servings of milk per day, 2 servings of fatty fish per week, and moderate consumption of margarine—provides only 7.6 µg. Adding a 400-IU supplement is recommended for individuals over 50 years9 and would bring the ideal intake level up to 17.6 µg; however, only a fraction of our population takes these supplements.10
None of these “new” recommendations (shown in the graph) exceed the current upper level (UL) for vitamin D of 50 µg (2,000 IU) for individuals over 1 year of age. By definition, the UL is actually a safe intake with negligible risk for adverse effects.4 In fact, vitamin D may be ingested to levels of 250 µg (10,000 IU) by adults with no evidence of harm.11 However, until DRI values are revised, it is prudent to advise patients not to exceed 50 µg (2,000 IU) without monitoring by a health professional.
Highlights
- The average Canadian diet does not provide enough vitamin D to achieve risk reduction for skeletal and nonskeletal diseases.
- Vitamin D fortification of foods is necessary as are strategies to promote the regular use of supplements in adults over 50 years.
- Optimum foods for fortification include cheese and yogourt since they are known sources of calcium and are often presumed also to contain vitamin D.
See also Calcium and Vitamin D: Improved Lipid Profile
| health studies, vitamin D |
References
- Holick MF. 2007. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 357:266-281.
- Bischoff-Ferrari H et al. 2006. Estimation of optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D for multiple health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 84:18-28.
- Heaney, RP. 2007. The case for improving vitamin D status. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 103:635-641.
- Institute of Medicine. 1997. Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin D and fluoride. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
- Brown JP, Josse RG. 2002. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167(10 Suppl):S1-34.
- Canadian Cancer Society. http://www.cancer.ca/ccs/internet/standard/0,3182,3172_1176359459_langId-en,00.html. Accessed 10/10/2007.
- Canadian Pediatric Society. 2007. Vitamin D supplementation: recommendations for Canadian mothers and infants. Paediatr Child Health 12:583-589.
- Vatanparast H, Whiting, SJ (unpublished). Data from Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) Cycle 2.2, 2004.
- Health Canada. 2007. Vitamin D for people over 50: Background. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/food-guide-aliment/context/evid-fond/vita_d_e.html. Accessed 10/10/2007.
- Troppmann L et al. 2002. Natural health product use in Canada. Can J Publ Hlth 93:426-430.
- Hathcock JN et al. 2007. Risk assessment for vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr 85:6-18.
Keywords: vitamin D, health studies
Scientific Evidence Keywords
Related Articles
-
Milk Products and the Prevention of Colon Cancer
Colon cancer is the third most common cancer in males and females and the second leading cause of mortality in the Western World. It has been estimated that in Canada in 2009, a total of 22,000 individuals will develop colon cancer (12,100 males/9,900 females). The incidence rate of this...
Continue reading -
Protein and Bone Health
While calcium and vitamin D are well recognized for their role in the prevention of osteoporosis, the impact of dietary protein on bone health is less well understood. A well-accepted hypothesis holds that high-protein diets are possibly/potentially detrimental to bone because they...
Continue reading
